architecture

Thursday, September 15, 2005

Plagiarism Roundup

Architects copying architects seems to be a big issue lately, sparked by a lawsuit against SOM and David Childs over the design of Freedom Tower.

Here's some articles/web pages that address the topic:
:: When Architects Plagiarize, It's not always bad by Witold Rybczynski
:: Brother from Another Mother by Clay Risen
:: Hi, Gorgeous. Haven't I Seen You Somewhere? by Fred A. Bernstein (this article is now in the New York Times' pay-per-view archive, though I'll update the link if and when Mr. Bernstein puts it on his own site)
:: Gutterland Police Blotter
And some blog posts that deal mainly with Shine v. SOM and Bernstein's article above:
:: The Anxiety of Influence at Veritas et Venustas
:: Twisting in the Wind at The Party Copyright Blog
:: The Collective Wellspring of Activity at OnTheCommons.org
:: Discussion at Archinect
:: Imitation of Art at Babble/On Project (with images from Bernstein article)
:: The Endless Saga of 9/11 at Proceed at your own risk
So why all the discussion? What's the big deal? It seems to break down into these points:
:: The value of (striving for) originality and novelty in contemporary architecture,
:: The lack of a dominant aesthetic in the same,
:: The (mostly unacknowledged) importance of precedents and previous built works to architects, and
:: The difficulty in applying copyright law to architectural design.
For a good background on copyright law, particularly the 1990 Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act, check out the Patry Copyright page linked above. William Patry (who worked on a report that lead to the Act) explains the logic behind the decision to move ahead with Shine v. SOM, illuminating some rather flimsy tactics by SOM to squash the lawsuit.

No comments:

Post a Comment